I was reading this article
on Heidi Ewing and Rachel Grady’s documentary Jesus Camp. It looks like Michael
Moore screened the documentary against the wishes of its distributor, Magnolia Pictures, at his Traverse
City Film Festival. Jesus Camp is about children that attend an evangelical
summer camp in North Dakota. Apparently, Magnolia did want the doc
screened at his festival and later said it wanted to pull the documentary out
from Moore’s festival, because it didn’t want people assuming the film had an
agenda. Moore, on the other hand, thinks Magnolia decided to pull out as a big
publicity stunt and went ahead and screened the film anyways for more than 600
people during two sold-out festival showings!
Here’s the full article
from indiewire: http://www.indiewire.com/ots/2006/08/jesus_camps_uni.html
When A Fest Strategy Goes Awry: Traverse City Screens "Jesus Camp" Against Magnolia's Wishes
by Eugene Hernandez (August 6, 2006)
Heidi Ewing and Rachel Grady's "Jesus Camp," an
unreleased documentary that insiders hope will play to audiences on all
sides of the political spectrum, gained significant media attention in
recent days when its distributor, Magnolia Pictures, unsuccessfully tried to stop Michael Moore from showing the film at his growing Traverse City Film Festival
in Michigan this weekend. Against the wishes of those involved with the
production, the movie, about a group of children that attend an
evangelical summer camp in North Dakota, was boldly screened for more
than 600 people during two sold-out festival showings. As reported in
indieWIRE and other publications more than ten days ago, Magnolia
decided to pull the film, concerned that screenings in a festival
headed by Moore would taint the perception of the film in the run up to
its theatrical release. Despite requests, Moore and the festival
decided to screen the film anyway.
The whole incident underscored how a film's
festival strategy can change quickly once a movie is acquired for
distribution. And it raised questions about the accountability of a
film festival after that ownership changes. The situation also gave
both the festival and the film a boost of much-appreciated publicity.
"Jesus Camp", intended to play to both sides of the aisles,
certainly had both sides of this battle seeing and skewing the incident
to their own advantage. In a statement issued Friday, Moore called the
move to take the film out of his festival "one of the worst publicity
stunts I've ever seen," saying that he was "begged" to show the movie
but then received a letter requesting the cancellation a day before the
screening. Magnolia however, maintained that moves to pull the film
began back in mid-July after it acquired the film. In a conversation
with indieWIRE on Friday, Magnolia president Eamonn Bowles reiterated, "I don't want the perception out in the public that this is an agenda-laden film."
In a letter addressed to Moore (and sent to indieWIRE), Magnolia's
Bowles reiterated his rights to the movie adding that the Traverse City
fest was not authorized to show the movie, emphasizing his concerns
that, "showing the film at a festival so closely aligned with Michael
Moore will create the misimpression that the film is left-leaning and
critical of its subject matter, when, in fact, the film is a balanced
and objective work."
Moore saw the movie at the Tribeca Film Festival in April and producers A & E Indie Films and rep Cinetic Media
booked the festival showings. But, indieWIRE became aware of Magnolia's
concerns even before the "Jesus Camp" deal was announced. The company
objected to the film being listed on the lineup in mid-July when the
Traverse City roster was highlighted in indieWIRE. An insider connected
to the film told indieWIRE on Friday that Traverse City organizers were
aware of the decision to remove the film back on July 13 or 14th, when
they in fact pleaded with the "Jesus Camp" team to keep the film in the
fest because both screenings were already sold-out and a Magnolia rep
was scheduled to speak on a panel.
Filmmakers Ewing and Grady decided to stay out of the recent fracas,
since they weren't involved in implementing the festival strategy
before or after the deal was made with Magnolia. Ewing, who is from
Michigan, admitted that some family members would be seeing the movie
in Traverse City and would report back on the reaction. "As far as the
rest of it," Ewing told indieWIRE, "Rachel and I have three words: slow
news day."
John Hull, a Traverse City resident who works as a zoning
administrator in a nearby town, attended the first screening of the
film on Friday and told indieWIRE this weekend that the controversy was
not mentioned at the "Jesus Camp" screening. Asked for his take on the
movie, Hull told indieWIRE, "'Jesus Camp' was outstanding, and
horrifying, in that so many Americans can be so militant and
theocratic. Their speech was thick with statements about conflict and
war. It was very well made and absent of any commentary. The subjects
spoke for themselves." Continuing, Hull added, "I spoke with an
acquaintance who had caught the other screening, and his reactions were
the same as mine. The people in the film were so bizarre, yet they were
so sincere, they were like Leslie Neilsen in 'Airplane'."
The biggest surprise of the whole incident, for many, was the fact
that Moore and his festival would screen the movie over the objections
of those who are responsible for it, an action unheard of in festival
circles, but one perhaps bolstered by Moore's notoriety. Bowles added
that he would not pursue legal action, despite his requests being
ignored.
A film being removed from a festival after a lineup has already been
announced is certainly not unheard of, but in such instances, festivals
typically respect the wishes of distributors, according to a number of
other event planners. At SXSW, organizers faced just such a problem when Sony Pictures Classics acquired "American Hardcore" just after its Sundance Film Festival
debut this year. SXSW already had a commitment from the filmmaker and
the film was listed in all fest materials, but Sony Classics decided to
hold the film for fall festivals closer to its intended release date.
"We understood, these things happen," SXSW film festival producer Matt Dentler explained, in a conversation with indieWIRE on Friday. Dentler noted that in other cases, as with "Super Size Me" and "Napoleon Dynamite" in 2004, both films were acquired at Sundance after being booked by SXSW, but the buyers (Roadside Attractions and Samuel Goldwyn Films for "Super Size" and Fox Searchlight for "Napoleon") decided to honor the committment and use the screenings to promote upcoming releases of the films.
"Distributors know the landscape rather well," explained Dentler,
adding, "I would like to think that we have a pretty good relationship
with both filmmakers and distributors. So, if it changes overnight from
working with one to working with the other (as was the case with "Super
Size Me" and "Napoleon"), more often than not we're still working with
people we know." He added, "I mean, we're always going to concede to
the distributor's wishes."
"We deal with it as it happens," offered David Kwok, a programmer at the Tribeca Film Festival,
who reiterated that his festival maintains continual communication with
its filmmakers to try and avoid such situations. "We usually know that
something is going to happen," he explained. "It only becomes a problem
for us when films do need to be pulled out, but that doesn't happen
that often -- or we work it out with the distributor to still keep the
title."
"Broadly speaking," explained Christian Gaines, head of AFI Fest
in Los Angeles, "I would say that a larger, more established film
festival, with the strongest relationships with filmmakers, sales
agents and distributors, is less likely to have to deal with last-
minute changes in the programming for whatever reason, as festival
opportunities are generally seen as good for the film and filmmaker."
However, Gaines explained, "It's only natural as a film festival to
fight (the) decision to pull a film, citing event logistics and
audiences who may not know or care about the reasons for a film being
pulled. But he added, "I also think U.S. distributors that commit to
the assumed risk of a theatrical distribution then have the largest say
in the films' U.S. release strategy and are then in the position to
make these calls, however unpopular the decision might be."
"I always try to steer my colleagues in the festival world from
trying to pressure distributors," added SXSW's Dentler. "It doesn't
seem like good business to me. Why potentially burn a bridge? Some
festivals take it personally. We don't, we know that it's all part of
the process. And, in the end, a film getting picked up is good for
everybody."
Back in 1998, the Sundance Film Festival decided to drop Nick Broomfield's "Kurt and Courtney" documentary, just days before its debut, following apparent pressure from a record label and Courtney Love.
In that case, the filmmaker was against the decision, but the festival
decided to avoid a potential legal battle with a large record label and
a subject of the movie. The decision brought even more attention to the
film and Broomfield organized a separate local screening in Park City
for insiders and key press.
In the case of "Jesus Camp," even though the film screened against
the wishes of the distributors and those involved with the film, the
media attention about Magnolia's concerns distanced the movie from
Moore and gave the film an added bit of awareness.
"I am not complaining about the fact that this film's profile has
been raised," noted Bowles, in the conversation with indieWIRE.
Because, he added, "This films stands up to the scrutiny. I have no
problem going to bat for (it)."